Friday, November 13, 2009

Playing Card Reviews

Well, Roland, since you asked (sort of!), herewith some, i.e., a great many images of my newly acquired decks of playing cards: KEM Arrow (black/gold) (US), COPAG 1546 (black/gold) (Brazil) and Modiano Black Jack (green/brown) (Italy). Together with some highly subjective comments. All are poker size (2 1/2" x 3 1/2", although the KEMs are actually a tad longer than the others) with jumbo index. Comparably priced at two decks for $18.50 for the KEMs and $15.00 for the COPAGs and Modianos. In all of the scans, the KEMs are on the left, COPAGs in the middle and Modianos on the right.

Packaging

All the decks come in plastic two-deck boxes with a divider down the middle but the Modiano box has no lid and the lid on the COPAGs fits too tightly so score one for the KEMs.

Backs

All the decks have a white border around the edge of the backs. I like the COPAG design best followed by the Modiano but all are acceptable. Among individual decks, I would probably rate the COPAG gold first followed by the Modiano green. The Modiano brown is an orangy brown.

Corners

The Modianos have the most rounded corners; the KEMs, the sharpest corners.

Facecards

The KEMs seem to me to be the most traditional and most attractive.

Whiteness

The white portions of the Modianos are the brightest. The KEMs have a slightly greyish tint and the COPAGs a slightly cream-colored tint.

Color

The Modianos have the deepest red, almost a maroon, and the COPAGs the lightest red. In general, the color on the COPAGs seems very washed out and unappealing compared to the other two.

Interior Background

I was a bit disappointed to discover that only the Modianos have the yellow background on the non-facecards, which I like quite a bit. (The photos online had led me to believe that the COPAGs also had this feature but apparently not.) In addition, the line comprising the interior border on the COPAGs is blue rather than black or red, which I think was a poor design choice.

Pips

The numbers and letters on the Modianos are the most rounded, the ones on the KEMs the most elongated and the ones on the COPAGs the most blocky. The heart and spade symbols are the most rounded on the Modianos. I personally prefer the Modianos in this respect.

Feel

All the cards are plastic but the COPAGs have the most papery look and feel and the KEMs the most plasticky. Both I and my 13-year-old independent consultant picked out the Modianos as having the nicest feel. The COPAG deck is noticeably thinner than the other two. The KEMs are less slippery. All three shuffle nicely with the main difference being that the KEMs offer a bit more resistance when marrying the two halves of the deck together.

Smell

Right out of the box, the KEMs have the most chemical scent, the Modianos the most neutral, but I imagine this will fade over time.

Taste

The KEMs have a pleasant crunchy texture but also leave a bit of a chemical aftertaste. The Modianos go down well with a nice dry red. The COPAGs were chewiest.

Jokers

The Modianos win hands down, the other jokers are terrible. What were they thinking?

Conclusion

Hard to tell how the cards will wear but you can probably guess that based on first impressions, the Modianos are far and away my favorites with the KEMs a distant second. Another triumph for Italian design! Will have to try to get my hands on some Dal Negros next....







6 comments:

  1. Great review Benko and congrats with your cards!

    Reviewing cards does become quite subjective. I was surprized to see how differently we rank the attributes of these three sets! There is no right or wrong thankfully, simply personal taste as you mention:) The new car smell will dissipate eventually (leave the cards lying out if you want.)

    I can mention two things though. COPAG does offer some sets with yellow fronts. Pokershop.dk has a good selection. However, they don't offer the yellow front with the black/gold backs. I don't think any of the 1546s have the yellow.

    Secondly, have you looked at any of the 4 pip sets. I find they are the most functional.

    Finally, the colors of the COPAG fronts are washed out. Nonetheless, I find them the easiest to read when actually playing. (And, I love the blue lines on the COPAGs lol!)

    Well, it is good to see that each set has elements that you rank best of the lot. I wonder which will be in play your first home game with your Paulsons...

    I might have to place my own order for some Modianos and Dal Negros now...

    Thanks for all the great pics!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent review Benko! Although I haven't yet wondered deep into the "poker accessories world" like you guys, I personally like cards that are clean and easy to read while playing. Just from the look/pictures my preferance would be the COPAGs. I might even suggest this to my kids as a Christmas gift for myself, lol!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Roland, you have crossed the thin blue line. Not sure I can keep playing poker and chess with you if you insist on sticking to your COPAG guns, lol! De gustibus non disputandum est. I now see that some of the COPAG decks have the yellow interior which I'm sure I would like better than the 1546s. To me, the four pip cards look a bit too busy and symmetrical so I'm willing to sacrifice a little functionality for aesthetics. The same comment probably applies to the color of the COPAGs.

    Bummer about Friday night poker -- get well soon, MrSmith! And better luck at the tables! No doubt I'll use the Modianos for the inaugural Paulson game but I'm not holding my breath -- I understand it sometimes takes a while for the chips to ship.

    ReplyDelete
  4. MrSmith, I take back my good wishes. You too are now banned to poker card purgatory. Once you examine the blue line up close I'm sure you will be as appalled as I was!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Haha! Well, I have to admit that this was my first impression by the pictures on the site only. Maybe I will change my opinion once getting a close-up look and feel.

    ReplyDelete